Invisible Spotlight

Amanda Simioni, A Multi-Talented And Adventurous Entrepreneur From Brazil

Amanda Simioni

Multi-Talented And Adventurous Entrepreneur From Brazil

Invisible Spotlight

"I'm very proud of my entrepreneurship and my independence."

Meet Amanda, an agent who became part of the Invisible family a year and 5 months ago.

We reached out to learn more about her!

Where are you located?

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

How would you describe yourself?

I am a very logical, curious, and adventurous person. I'm constantly questioning how many unexplored possibilities there are for both simple and complex problems. I grew up to be a very transdisciplinary thinker; I cannot help but piece out different knowledge fields to reflect on the things in my life. I love a good debate, and to surround myself with art and flowers. Finally, I'm a chronic overthinker!

What are your hobbies?

I love creating flower arrangements. In general, mixing and matching colors and scents gives me the sensation that I'm doing an alchemist's work, which is magical. I like painting and visiting public places to patiently observe how people act and move. Some other hobbies include: reading, going to the theater, watching movies, and dancing.

What did you do before Invisible?

I was doing my Master's in International Political Economy at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. I was a fully funded researcher and dedicated my time integrally to conducting research, teaching, reviewing articles, organizing events, and all things related to the Academics. I also worked in politics and marketing advising.

Why did you decide to join Invisible?

It's been quite a while since I joined Invisible. I was attracted by a very interesting role immersed in a global and diverse culture. I always loved food, and at the apex of pandemics I felt an immense will to contribute to the thriving community of restaurants I would be digitalizing data for, bringing the visibility they deserved. The role taught me a ton, and I loved my team. It was truly remarkable how much I got to learn and the steps I took in growing.

What is one of your most memorable moments at Invisible?

In the collection of memories from invisible, one of my fondest is my last day as Squad Lead at the Brown Team. To give a brief introduction, we worked the last semester together and bonded. We were curious about each other's culture and struggles, and liked to hear about each other's day, and stayed until late off-hours keeping each other company. I got to lead the team for approximately two months, and I learned plenty from my leader at the time. She took the team from the beginning and really raised the bar as she did a marvelous job connecting us as the beautiful group we turned into. After she left, I felt the pressure - it was not the first time I managed a team, but I still got butterflies. It took time and effort as I cared a lot about my colleagues and friends and wanted us to maintain top-notch quality. Of all the teams at the time, Brown was one of the shyest. We only turned our cameras after several months (yet, there are people I have yet to see). When, after two months, the moment to say goodbye arrived, I was surprised with a very affectionate farewell. To my surprise, almost everyone turned their cameras on, and I felt grateful and happy to see their effort to be there and show they valued me as their manager and friend.

What are Your Top 3 moments at Invisible?

01|

02|

03|

Can you name something you are proud of? An achievement, or anything else in your life!

I'm very proud of my entrepreneurship and my independence. I felt the strong urge to leave home at 18 to pursue my bachelor's degree at a distinguished university. Years later, I received a scholarship to conduct field research in Venezuela, which was published as my final thesis. Again, years later, I would decide to move to Rio de Janeiro after being awarded a scholarship to continue my research career at one of Latin America's most prestigious universities.

How would you describe Invisible to someone who wants to join our team?

It is geared towards autonomy and owning your work; it's an ever-evolving and ever-changing environment for people who embrace change as a constructive force. There is room for logical and stability enthusiasts, but not the environment if you're stubborn. It's about knowing your expertise and ensuring you're communicating that to best contribute and learn. Also, brace yourself for the accelerated learning curve you'll find here.

What is it that keeps you at Invisible?

Improve with each coming day, I'm never stagnant. I'm grateful for the work I get to do every day and the unique people I share it with. I like how open and horizontal the communication is and the available possibilities. My main concern is delivering the best work possible, and I'm happy to invest my time in improving and learning all things that will make me accomplish that.

It's about knowing your expertise and ensuring you're communicating that to best contribute and learn.

We value your critical thinking at Invisible, Amanda!!

Want to join an elite team of global professionals?

Andrew Hull

Meet Amanda, an agent who became part of the Invisible family a year and 5 months ago.

We reached out to learn more about her!

Where are you located?

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

How would you describe yourself?

I am a very logical, curious, and adventurous person. I'm constantly questioning how many unexplored possibilities there are for both simple and complex problems. I grew up to be a very transdisciplinary thinker; I cannot help but piece out different knowledge fields to reflect on the things in my life. I love a good debate, and to surround myself with art and flowers. Finally, I'm a chronic overthinker!

What are your hobbies?

I love creating flower arrangements. In general, mixing and matching colors and scents gives me the sensation that I'm doing an alchemist's work, which is magical. I like painting and visiting public places to patiently observe how people act and move. Some other hobbies include: reading, going to the theater, watching movies, and dancing.

What did you do before Invisible?

I was doing my Master's in International Political Economy at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. I was a fully funded researcher and dedicated my time integrally to conducting research, teaching, reviewing articles, organizing events, and all things related to the Academics. I also worked in politics and marketing advising.

Why did you decide to join Invisible?

It's been quite a while since I joined Invisible. I was attracted by a very interesting role immersed in a global and diverse culture. I always loved food, and at the apex of pandemics I felt an immense will to contribute to the thriving community of restaurants I would be digitalizing data for, bringing the visibility they deserved. The role taught me a ton, and I loved my team. It was truly remarkable how much I got to learn and the steps I took in growing.

What is one of your most memorable moments at Invisible?

In the collection of memories from invisible, one of my fondest is my last day as Squad Lead at the Brown Team. To give a brief introduction, we worked the last semester together and bonded. We were curious about each other's culture and struggles, and liked to hear about each other's day, and stayed until late off-hours keeping each other company. I got to lead the team for approximately two months, and I learned plenty from my leader at the time. She took the team from the beginning and really raised the bar as she did a marvelous job connecting us as the beautiful group we turned into. After she left, I felt the pressure - it was not the first time I managed a team, but I still got butterflies. It took time and effort as I cared a lot about my colleagues and friends and wanted us to maintain top-notch quality. Of all the teams at the time, Brown was one of the shyest. We only turned our cameras after several months (yet, there are people I have yet to see). When, after two months, the moment to say goodbye arrived, I was surprised with a very affectionate farewell. To my surprise, almost everyone turned their cameras on, and I felt grateful and happy to see their effort to be there and show they valued me as their manager and friend.

Overview

LLM Task

Benchmark Dataset/Corpus

Sentiment Analysis

SST-1/SST-2

Natural Language Inference /  Recognizing Textual Entailment

Stanford Natural Language Inference Corpus (SNLI)

Named Entity Recognition

conll-2003

Question Answering

SQuAD

Machine Translation

WMT

Text Summarization

CNN/Daily Mail Dataset

Text Generation

WikiText

Paraphrasing

MRPC

Language Modelling

Penn Tree Bank

Bias Detection

StereoSet

LLM Task

Benchmark Dataset/Corpus

Common Metric

Dataset available at

Sentiment Analysis

SST-1/SST-2

Accuracy

https://huggingface
.co/datasets/sst2

Natural Language Inference /  Recognizing Textual Entailment

Stanford Natural Language Inference Corpus (SNLI)

Accuracy

https://nlp.stanford.edu
projects/snli/

Named Entity Recognition

conll-2003

F1 Score

https://huggingface.co/
datasets/conll2003

Question Answering

SQuAD

F1 Score, Exact Match, ROUGE

https://rajpurkar.github.i
o/SQuAD-explorer/

Machine Translation

WMT

BLEU, METEOR

https://machinetranslate
.org/wmt

Text Summarization

CNN/Daily Mail Dataset

ROUGE

https://www.tensorflow
.org/datasets/catalog/
cnn_dailymail

Text Generation

WikiText

BLEU, ROUGE

https://www.salesforce.
com/products/einstein/
ai-research/the-wikitext-dependency-language-modeling-dataset/

Paraphrasing

MRPC

ROUGE, BLEU

https://www.microsoft.
com/en-us/download/details.a
spx?id=52398

Language Modelling

Penn Tree Bank

Perplexity

https://zenodo.org/recor
d/3910021#.ZB3qdHbP
23A

Bias Detection

StereoSet

Bias Score, Differential Performance

https://huggingface.co/
datasets/stereoset

Table 1 - Example of some LLM tasks with common benchmark datasets and their respective metrics. Please note for many of these tasks, there are multiple benchmark datasets, some of which have not been mentioned here.

Metric Selection

Metric

Usage

Accuracy

Measures the proportion of correct predictions made by the model compared to the total number of predictions.

Precision

Measures the proportion of true positives out of all positive predictions.

Recall

Measures the proportion of true positives out of all actual positive instances.

F1 Score

Measures the harmonic mean of precision and recall.

Perplexity

Measures the model's uncertainty in predicting the next token (common in text generation tasks).

BLEU

Measures the similarity between machine-generated text and reference text.

ROUGE

Measures the similarity between machine-generated and human-generated text.

METEOR

May have higher computational complexity compared to BLEU or ROUGE.Requires linguistic resources for matching, which may not be available for all languages.

Pros

Cons

Simple interpretability. Provides an overall measure of model performance.

Sensitive to dataset imbalances, which can make it not informative. Does not take into account false positives and false negatives.

Useful when the cost of false positives is high. Measures the accuracy of positive predictions.

Does not take into account false negatives.Depends on other metrics to be informative (cannot be used alone).Sensitive to dataset imbalances.

Useful when the cost of false negatives is high.

Does not take into account false negatives.Depends on other metrics to be informative (cannot be used alone)and Sensitive to dataset imbalances.

Robust to imbalanced datasets.

Assumes equal importance of precision and recall.May not be suitable for multi-class classification problems with different class distributions.

Interpretable as it provides a single value for model performance.

May not directly correlate with human judgment.

Correlates well with human judgment.Easily interpretable for measuring translation quality.

Does not directly explain the performance on certain tasks (but correlates with human judgment).Lacks sensitivity to word order and semantic meaning.

Has multiple variants to capture different aspects of similarity.

May not capture semantic similarity beyond n-grams or LCS.Limited to measuring surface-level overlap.

Addresses some limitations of BLEU, such as recall and synonyms.

May have higher computational complexity compared to BLEU or ROUGE.Requires linguistic resources for matching, which may not be available for all languages.

Metric

Usage

Pros

Cons

Accuracy

Measures the proportion of correct predictions made by the model compared to the total number of predictions.

Simple interpretability. Provides an overall measure of model performance.

Sensitive to dataset imbalances, which can make it not informative. Does not take into account false positives and false negatives.

Precision

Measures the proportion of true positives out of all positive predictions.

Useful when the cost of false positives is high. Measures the accuracy of positive predictions.

Does not take into account false negatives.Depends on other metrics to be informative (cannot be used alone).Sensitive to dataset imbalances.

Recall

Measures the proportion of true positives out of all actual positive instances.

Useful when the cost of false negatives is high.

Does not take into account false negatives.Depends on other metrics to be informative (cannot be used alone)and Sensitive to dataset imbalances.

F1 Score

Measures the harmonic mean of precision and recall.

Robust to imbalanced datasets.

Assumes equal importance of precision and recall.May not be suitable for multi-class classification problems with different class distributions.

Perplexity

Measures the model's uncertainty in predicting the next token (common in text generation tasks).

Interpretable as it provides a single value for model performance.

May not directly correlate with human judgment.

BLEU

Measures the similarity between machine-generated text and reference text.

Correlates well with human judgment.Easily interpretable for measuring translation quality.

Does not directly explain the performance on certain tasks (but correlates with human judgment).Lacks sensitivity to word order and semantic meaning.

ROUGE

Measures the similarity between machine-generated and human-generated text.

Has multiple variants to capture different aspects of similarity.

May not capture semantic similarity beyond n-grams or LCS.Limited to measuring surface-level overlap.

METEOR

Measures the similarity between machine-generated translations and reference translations.

Addresses some limitations of BLEU, such as recall and synonyms.

May have higher computational complexity compared to BLEU or ROUGE.Requires linguistic resources for matching, which may not be available for all languages.

Table 2 - Common LLM metrics, their usage as a measurement tool, and their pros and cons. Note that for some of these metrics there exist different versions. For example, some of the versions of ROUGE include ROUGE-N, ROUGE-L, and ROUGE-W. For context, ROUGE-N measures the overlap of sequences of n-length-words between the text reference and the model-generated text. ROUGE-L measures the overlap between the longest common subsequence of tokens in the reference text and generated text, regardless of order. ROUGE-W on the other hand, assigns weights (relative importances) to longer common sub-sequences of common tokens (similar to ROUGE-L but with added weights). A combination of the most relevant variants of a metric, like ROUGE is selected for comprehensive evaluation.

Andrew Hull

Schedule a call to learn more about how Invisible might help your business grow while navigating uncertainty.

Schedule a Call
Request a Demo
Request a Demo
Request a Demo
Request a Demo
Request a Demo
Request a Demo
Request a Demo
Request a Demo
Request a Demo
Request a Demo
Request a Demo